Dennis Román | Project Portfolio

Aerodynamics Research (Non-CFD)

High School Study: Winglet Shape, Vortices, and Design Tradeoffs

Eight-month high school research study comparing winglet architectures through CAD review and literature-backed CFD result synthesis to guide design recommendations.

CAD ReviewLiterature SynthesisTechnical WritingComparative Analysis
Winglet study title page

Report title page from the high school winglet study.

Snapshot

  • Project type: High school independent aerodynamics research
  • Institution context: Colegio San Jose de Rio Piedras
  • Timeline: October 2023 to May 2024
  • Important scope note: I did not run the CFD simulations myself in this project; I analyzed published CFD outputs and related data.

Objective

  • Compare how different winglet families influence induced drag, vortex behavior, and practical aircraft performance.
  • Distill a large set of references into engineering-useful guidance for design selection.
  • Balance aerodynamic gains with real-world implementation constraints.

Method used

  • Performed historical analysis of major winglet evolution in commercial aviation.
  • Reviewed CAD model descriptions and geometry conventions from published studies.
  • Synthesized CFD-based findings from literature across:
    • Lift-to-drag trends
    • Vortex clustering/dispersion behavior
    • Angle-of-attack and Reynolds-number sensitivity
  • Mapped findings to operational considerations (range, endurance, manufacturability, airport constraints).

Key findings from the high school paper

  • No single winglet is universally optimal across all mission profiles.
  • Blended and split-tip concepts show strong vortex-management advantages in many use cases.
  • Raked wingtips can improve endurance/range in long-haul oriented scenarios by aspect-ratio effects.
  • Variable-cant/canted concepts appear promising for adaptable multi-condition performance.

What this project demonstrates

  • Early technical maturity in reviewing and synthesizing aerospace CFD literature.
  • Ability to write decision-oriented engineering documentation with evidence traceability.
  • Strong foundation that later transitioned into hands-on CFD-heavy projects at college level.

Source document

  • PDF used for this entry: Aerodynamic Effects of Winglet Shape (1).docx (1).pdf

Validation

  • Conclusions cross-checked across multiple peer-reviewed studies

    pass

  • Direct CFD execution by author

    planned

    This project synthesized existing CFD results; no direct CFD runs were performed by me.

Reproducibility

  • Reference-traceable structure

    Every major claim tied back to cited literature in the report bibliography.

  • Method segmentation

    Historical analysis, CAD appraisal, simulation review, and practical constraints kept as separate phases.

  • Decision-oriented synthesis

    Compared lift/drag/vortex trends to produce actionable winglet-selection guidance.