Residual convergence view used to confirm solution progress and reporting windows.
Project framing
- Independent motorsports aero development project centered on a Mazda MX-5 (NC).
- Objective: compare realistic concept options under packaging and implementation constraints.
- Concise summary for portfolio; details available on request.
Case index
- Multi-concept package comparison: Baseline vs ducktail, diffuser, undertray, wheel-deflector, and combined concept. Key output: relative drag/downforce behavior for concept selection.
- Convergence quality check: Residual and force-history behavior across compared variants. Key output: clear reporting windows and trend stability confidence.
- Ride-height sensitivity: Vertical setup shift impact on downforce magnitude. Key output: monotonic trend supporting setup tradeoff interpretation.
Portfolio-level interpretation
- Force-trace separation between concepts is sufficient for early screening decisions.
- Combined concept direction shows potential for stronger package-level effect than isolated devices.
- Ride-height sensitivity confirms practical setup dependence, making mechanical constraints part of aero decision-making.